Invisible Mending launch

On April 17 we were excited to host the launch of Mike Ladd’s new collection Invisible Mending right here at Wakefield Press.

Rachael Mead had the honour of launching Mike’s book. We recently hosted an exhibition of Rachael’s photography alongside the launch of Cassie Flanagan Willanski’s Here Where We Live, and it was a pleasure to have her back.

If you weren’t able to make it to the launch, don’t worry we’ve got you covered. You can read Rachael’s speech below!


Hello and thank you all so much for coming. It is my great pleasure and honour today to be launching the latest book by one Australia’s most loved and lauded writers – Mike Ladd.
I’ve just used the label “writer” and while we are here to celebrate the launch of Mike’s ninth book, to call Mike a writer is to try to squeeze him into a box that doesn’t properly contain him. Don’t get me wrong, Mike is one of Australia’s most esteemed poets and you can find his work in just about every anthology of Australian poetry in existence. Mike started his career as a poet at seventeen and by 25 he published his first collection The Crack in the Crib.
Just as he was launching his literary career, he started work for the ABC in Adelaide as a sound engineer and by 1997 he’d worked his way up to creating and producing his own Radio National program, Poetica which ran for 18 years until 2015, when it was taken off the air much to the outrage of Australia’s literary community. Mike’s current role with Radio National is in the features and documentary unit but once again the box of documentarian doesn’t contain him either.

In the 80s Mike was a musician in the new wave band The Lounge and he frequently collaborates with musicians and artists, writing poetry for the screen and live performance with groups such as The Drum Poets, newaural net, and Max Mo. He writes, films and edits video poetry and I would recommend finding Zoo After Dark, and The Eye of the Day on YouTube.

Rachael Mead and Mike Ladd
Most recently he and his partner the wonderful visual and installation artist Cathy Brooks have been running projects that put poems on street signs as public art and you can see their work in the Adelaide Bus Station and Tram Stop 6 on the line to Glenelg.

Now the reason I’ve gone on about Mike’s rich and varied creative career is that the book we are here for today, Invisible Mending, draws the many threads of his past work together. Invisible Mending is more than a poetry collection; it contains essays, creative non-fiction, personal vignettes and photographs. While on the surface this seems incredibly diverse it is a remarkably coherent mediation on themes of human impact on the natural world and how to mend the rents that grief, loss and change tear in our lives.

The book weaves together poetry and prose pieces, picking up and elaborating on themes that Mike has explored in past work; displacement and marginalization from Picture’s Edge, family and suburbia from Close to Home, and politics and social injustice in Rooms and Sequences. However, the themes of his most recent works clearly still preoccupy him. Transit explored the compounding effect of momentous life events in the construction of identity and healing after loss is a thread that weaves its way through Invisible Mending. Mike also continues to draw on his deep cultural and ecological understanding of Adelaide that was so beautifully expressed in Karrawirra Parri. Environmental devastation, particularly human impact on our natural world is another of Mike’s ongoing preoccupations. With these themes in mind we can see his choice of title is perfect. It is taken from a line in the final piece, “A Country Wedding”, where Mike notices the landscape healing itself after the devastation wrought by flood. This book is an intensely personal account healing after wreckage – both ecological and emotional.

To me, one of the most significant aspects of this book is that all these pieces are non-fiction. Mike is a documentarian and this book showcases his skill at observing subjects from different angles and digging at the surface until what lies beneath is revealed. The piece that best illustrates this is “Traffik” – a story set in Malaysia and Japan that resembles short fiction but is in fact drawn from real events. Mike produced this work of creative non-fiction from television and newspaper reports while he and Cath were in Malaysia and faced with the unavoidable evidence of deforestation and species loss as a result of the palm oil industry. But even so, the documentarian sees that not everything is black and white. At the heart of this piece is the understanding that emotional bonds can exist between species, and that as humans we do things, often inexcusable things for love and connection. While the ends don’t justify the means, those ends can be understandable, even beautiful. It is not easy, being human. Mike as documentarian observes and reports but does so with empathy and it is his ability to interweave reportage with compassion that makes this book both compelling and insightful.

Guests at the launch

I’d like to read you one of my favourite poems from the book now – “Travelling the Golden Highway, thinking of global warming”.

I read this to you not only an example of Mike’s brilliance as a poet, showing his mastery of minimalist style and his potent combination of natural and industrial imagery to powerful political effect. But to me this poem demonstrates how Mike, with so few words can embed us in an experience with him. We are there, both crammed into the backseat and crammed inside his head in that moment, thinking about the landscape and climate change. Again, Mike the documentarian is working with Mike the poet to translate his sensory experience of the world into such effective imagery that the reader is given an almost visceral understanding of being Mike Ladd at that point in time. It is this ability to transport us that also makes him a brilliant radio documentarian – in a world where sight is the prime sense he delivers stories that engage the mind by stimulating the minor senses, giving us access to experiences and situations that inspire and fascinate us, allow us to perceive the world differently, peel back layers and feel our way to understanding what lies behind the things we see.

There is so much to say and this book is so diverse yet so coherent I’m really struggling to make this concise so I’m just going to pick out one more thread from this book – a thread that runs through the whole collection – that of grief over the rents and losses that accrue throughout life and the ongoing work of mending to make oneself whole again. While the book moves geographically from Adelaide across Australian highways to the east coast then on to Malaysia, Sydney, South America, Spain and back to Australia the themes of family and loss travel with us – reinforcing that the things make us and break us in life are inescapable – love and grief.

Mike introduces us to his father and the heartbreaking progress of his dementia in the book’s first section, which is grounded in Adelaide and family. We are in Malaysia with Mike as he is researching the Malaysian roots of the pantun form when he hears of the death of his father. Like the Malaysian journey, the essay on the pantun veers into the personal as grief overwhelms all else. “The Book of Hours at Rimbun Dahan” is one of the most moving pieces on grief I have read. Please read it. Then look up the award-winning video poem Eye of the Day on YouTube. It is a gorgeous combination of a selection of tunggal pantun, sound and film and an immersive illustration of the experience grief, regret and distance.

I’m going to read for you now Winter Light.

Book Launch Guests
This book illuminates a writer’s commitment to the mending of grief, the work to close distances that gradually widen in families, the reclamation of lost histories, and the healing of land after centuries of abuse. We look at Mike and see the laid-back, generous, thoughtful man we think we know. But like all of us, this is just the coherent skin we show the world. Turn us inside out and you see all the darning, all the messy stitching holding us all together. And, to me, that’s what this book represents – these poems and stories, insights and observations – these words are all the stitches that hold Mike together. Turn him right side out and it’s Invisible Mending.

Congratulations Mike. It is truly brilliant work and I am honoured to declare Invisible Mending officially launched!

Rachael Mead

The Inconsequential Tourist by Stephen Orr

A guest blog from our adventuring novelist Stephen Orr, who’s currently conquering Europe.

You can check out Stephen’s award-winning novels here.

—

Sitting on a train from Berlin to Munich, it seems a good time to ruminate (lack of cows in fields, although plenty of wind turbines) on the nature of lit-tourism. Just past Dessau, villages, birch and the fiery glare from the white-blue eyes of an old man (what? what am I doing wrong?) across the train.

We can search for writers, we can go to the places they lived (for short times anyway) – but can we ever really find them? Evidence, everywhere, but most of it makes them seem too ordinary. Then again, what was I expecting?

It started in Dublin. The James Joyce House in North Great George’s Street. Joyce never lived here, but parts of several stories from Dubliners are set close by. Belvedere College at the end of the street, where Joyce was first taught by the fearful Jesuits. Eccles Street, Molly and Leopold wandering. A walking tour took me to Hardwicke Street, where Joyce once lived (opposite ‘The Boarding House’), although Joyce’s home has been consumed by council flats. It didn’t seem very, well, Joycean. A couple of kids on a motorised scooter kept circling the tour, and we had to move.

The James Joyce Centre

The James Joyce Centre, Dublin (next to ‘Orrwear’!)

 

Leipzig. Cast iron train station. Fifteen platforms with no one in sight.

So what was I expecting? To actually see Joyce? Work out why (and how) he wrote what he wrote? Nope. None of that. Just Dublin’s ever-present seagulls, rain, Liffey-chilled breezes, tourist buses. As I reminded myself this was the place he (like Samuel Beckett) escaped from. Maybe he wrote not because of Dublin, but despite it? Maybe that’s what writers do.

Swift would save the day. Bus to St Patrick’s Church (where he was dean, giving sermons about people falling asleep in church, meanwhile writing Gulliver’s Travels and pamphlets such as ‘A Modest Proposal’, about the necessity of eating your children to save the country money – the first and best satirist). I saw where he preached, lived, worked, was buried, but I didn’t see Jonathon Swift. I saw pictures, furniture, but not so much as a ghost.

London would save the day. A quick walk to Bloomsbury. 48 Doughty Street, where Charles Dickens lived during the first flushes of his success. Now, here was a writer’s house. All preserved from when the great man wrote several early novels. Sitting room (where wife Catherine was exiled with the kids), dining room (long boozy nights with Forster), then upstairs to the great man’s study. The actual desk where he penned Oliver Twist. But, it just seemed to be a desk. Shouldn’t it have been greater, grander, deskier? Bedroom, where he sired his generous brood, and up to the nursery. All so ordinary. The kitchen, laundry, cellar. Mm… I left feeling I knew Dickens no better. A sort of anti-climatic walk back to Trafalgar Square through theatreland. A stop at Russell Square, to gaze in the window where T.S. Eliot worked at Faber and Faber.

Charles Dickens's house, London

Charles Dickens’s house, London

 

More green fields, still no cows. The old man reads Die Welt, as die Welt passes us by (maybe he’s seen it too often). The conductor checks our tickets with the brutal efficiency that seems to characterise most things German.

As I ponder. The pattern repeats in Edinburgh (the cafe where Rowling scribbled The Philosopher’s Stone, the medical school where Conan Doyle learned all about deduction from his teacher, Joseph Bell, Stevenson’s old haunts, Scott’s house etc.) Then to Berlin. The Brecht House. The rooms where he wrote his plays and poems, the bed the threepenny playwright died in.

J.K. Rowling café, Edinburgh

The café in Edinburgh where J.K. Rowling wrote The Philosopher’s Stone

 

But Brecht wasn’t home. None of them were. Maybe the writers were in my head. One thing was interesting though. The important role these writers still play in their native countries. T-shirts, mugs, walking tours, the lot. In Ireland, most bookshops save the most prominent display at the front of the shop for Irish writers.

More turbines. Green, green grass. A few distant factories. Not really what I thought the German countryside would look like. But what did I expect?

Stephen Orr with Marx and Engels, Berlin

Stephen Orr with a couple of well-known writers, Berlin

 

Giles Bettison on the state of the arts

This year, Giles Bettison was the SA Living Artists Festival’s featured artist and the subject of our beautiful monograph.

Giles made a speech that brought the house down on opening night, and he’s kindly allowed us to share a bit of it with you here …

Good evening everyone. Tonight I would like to acknowledge the Kaurna people, whose land our ancestors occupied and on whose land we are standing now.

It is an amazing honour to be the featured artist for the 2015 SALA monograph. I never imagined that there would be a book about my work: it’s amazing and a bit overwhelming. Part of the price I have to pay for that honour is that I get to give this address tonight.

I never thought anyone would let me loose on a crowd like this. […]

Being recognised in South Australia and Adelaide like this is a very humbling experience. I hope that Margot Osborne and my contribution to this great series of documents will be both a useful addition to our South Australian cultural history as well as to artists and crafters alike all over the world. The opportunity to chronicle my work in the monograph is of inestimable value to me and I hope to the rest of the art and glass appreciating public.

I want to share with you ways that I think about the glass things I make and how I think about art. The things that keep me going and what I see as important things about art and what it does.

One of the things that I think art is for is to engage people. Art is a tool to help us to see ourselves and our world. More than ever, in these busy times people look without seeing, which is sad and dangerous. There is so much to see and know around us; we need to recognise it for our health and the health of others, our souls if you like.

Art helps us to know our world and engage with it. It gives us a different perspective than our own. It is people making representations of things and telling stories, something we have done for millennia. It shows we are seeing and thinking, that we are engaged.

We notice art because it is a different point of view than our own, it can take us outside ourselves and be a point of contact with others. We can see the difference between what we see and the perception of other people. It is also a perception of time. When you really see art you become part of a discussion about different ways of seeing things. When we are engaged and connected like this we are better able to care and to take care. With art the conversation begins and the dialogue goes on – if you let it …

In our high-tech and hyper-connected world people are more disconnected and disengaged than ever. Increasingly people are overloaded by the speed and intensity of the barrage of information being slung at us, most of it arbitrary and irrelevant at best. The so-called social media is actually anti-social media. People are interacting with screens more and more and interacting with actual people and things and their environment less and less. I have been to parks, restaurants and art galleries where most of the people there are on their devices, not interacting with each other. It’s tragic. It’s like they’re blind.

The more disconnected and disengaged we are, the easier it becomes to make decisions that don’t take the care of other people into consideration. We become isolated. It becomes easier to make decisions that are informed by fear and misunderstanding that do not have broad positive outcomes. I’ve experienced how destructive people working this way can be. I think we have all seen it and are aware of it.

It seems to me that there is a trend for people to isolate themselves from other people and from their environment. We need to engage and to commit to each other and to turn this trend around.

There are a whole bunch of things that happen when you are engaged by art. When you listen to a piece of music that moves you, you get tingles down your spine and your hair stands up. Your brain and body are being activated and it is usually a very good experience. I experience this when I attend great music concerts. At the beginning of the show we are just people trying to get to our seats or to a good position close to the band, but at the end of the show when we have all shared this expanding musical experience together and as we are all leaving, I feel a kind of connection to everyone. I imagine that my fellow concert goer feels this also. We have all shared the same experience and had similar uplifting feelings and everything feels right. We’re connected.

I have similar experiences with visual art. It can happen in nature, in crowds, in many ways in many different situations, but art specifically is the gift of people trying to elicit this connection and engagement a discussion with other people – one of our survival tools I believe.

When we are moved by art it is exercising our engagement muscle. The more we have these experiences and recognise them the better we are able to attain and maintain this condition. When we are in this state we are empathetic, we are more likely to make smart and caring choices. Art is good for the environment.

One of the important things about art and artists, this art gallery and all other galleries, is that they are places where discussions and engagement can happen. There is all the potential to engage and to be present and to give back. We need to engage and we need to make careful and compassionate choices.

SALA was and is visionary. It gives a huge cross section of artists across South Australia a valuable opportunity to engage in a dialogue with the broader public, a very important thing. I hope there are all kinds of discussions started and carried on as a result. We are all here to celebrate this kind of positive dialogue.

So, on that note please look and please think, please care and please speak.
Enjoy this event and as many other SALA events as you can.

This part of tonight’s entertainment is over. Thank you.

 

To read more about Giles and purchase his monograph, head over here.

Adrian Mitchell on writing our early stories

Adrian Mitchell has released two books this year, The Profilist on S.T. Gill (or someone very like him) and From Corner to Corner on Henry Colless.

Adrian’s written a wonderful meditation on these two characters, and he’s given us kind permission to share this insightful essay with you all —

 

Our past is full of old stories, the kind that go wandering about and are very often just out of sight, or memory. There’s a delight in retrieving these, whenever we come across them; and another in determining how to re-present them.

Samuel Thomas Gill and Henry Colless then: two figures who couldn’t be more disparate if they tried. They both inhabited an all too recognisable Australia, the colonial Australia that gave rise to our culture, our ideas and stories about ourselves. Gill observed the colonial world closely, and drew his conclusions. Henry Colless lived right inside the culture of the outback, the Australia of Russel Ward’s Australian legend. In part, he helped to make it.

Sturt's overland expedition by S.T. Gill

Sturt’s overland expedition leaving Adelaide, 10th August 1844 by S.T. Gill

Gill was an onlooker, Colless was a doer. They both took a lively interest in their country, and neither was disheartened by adversity or downturns of luck. Indeed, that was part and parcel of the colonial experience. That is why in The Profilist I give prominence to the theme of the adventitious, not just in Ethan Dibble’s/S.T. Gill’s fortunes, but also in the lives of governors, explorers, entrepreneurs of all cuts of cloth. Henry Colless took a gamble and made his fortune; then the hard times of the Federation drought withered it away. But what a heady ride he had along the way.

One of the things I like about Gill is that he is remarkably verbal in his sketches. Which is not quite the same thing as narrative art, though he does that too. The details of his scenes are explained when we translate them for ourselves, the reason for the arrangement becomes clear. The tensions between the different parts declare themselves conceptually just as much as visually.

And there are all those punning titles to encourage us down that tricky path too.

The Profilist

The Profilist by Adrian Mitchell

Gill saw his world in precise and colourful detail. He took it all in, and delighted in it. That is where he is so out of the ordinary. He was not interested in doing those grand heavily varnished quarter-acre sketches in our major galleries, and before which we are meant to genuflect – the ones that gave rise to Marcus Clarke’s view that weird melancholy is the keynote of the Australian landscape. Gill is all about light and life and energy. He had his own view of what to draw – people, all sorts of people, people on goldfields or in burgeoning towns, or people in landscapes. What we see through his eyes is what he thought about it all. He had a very intriguing sense of wry amusement.

Henry Colless on the other hand was as large as life and twice as busy. He was one of the Cornstalk boys from along the Hawkesbury who evolved the type of colonial independence that gave grief to officers and officials – not just from being curmudgeonly (undoubtedly a touch of that though) but from refusing to be bossed about. At quite a young age he was moving large herds of cattle about, trying to dodge the worst extremes of drought. Eventually he took a large mob across the Corner country to establish Innamincka station, and build the first stone building anywhere in that country. And the cattle he raised and fattened there were amongst the best on the market.

From Corner to Corner

From Corner to Corner by Adrian Mitchell

In Bourke, where he had been mine host at the Tattersall’s Hotel, he busied himself in the town’s affairs, a leading figure at the times of the various floods, a councillor, a pastoralist and a respected appointee to the Pastures Board. And a long serving member of the local Jockey Club. He loved his horses, even when they kicked him, bit off his finger, rolled on top of him. He was a complete pioneer, and was buried with his swag and stockwhip.

Both were worn out by life.  Gill died on the steps of the GPO, Melbourne, and the deposition at the coronial enquiry makes for sorry reading. Henry Colless outlasted all his many siblings but died equally impoverished, of what used to be called senile decay.  There wasn’t enough money in the family to put up a headstone; which makes his ending comparable with Gill’s pauper’s grave.  Death the great leveller indeed.
…

The Profilist is available here and From Corner to Corner is available here.

Thursday links

Happy Thursday, kiddos!

I’ve been hoarding up a few links to share with you guys …

Do you spend as much time thinking about text-message punctuation as I do? Jessica Bennet at the New York Times does too! This is a fascinating article about the way that punctuation is used differently in messages.

Going back to our discussion of quotas from last week, here’s an old but good article about self-imposed quotas from Overland (with some fantastic discussion in the comments!).

Favourite book never been made into a film? Here’s a list of the top eleven famous books that have proven themselves to be unfilmable. I think they’re just not being creative enough, personally. Gabriel García Márquez’s advice for a film adaptation of 100 Years of Solitude:

We must film the entire book, but only release one chapter—two minutes long—each year, for 100 years

Easy, right?

And to get you through this dreary weather —

The Stella Count 2014

The Stella Count for 2014 is in!

This wonderful little study, conducted by the same people behind the Stella Prize, looks at gender (im)balance in book reviews across Australia. You can see the full results here.

What’s the take-home message? Most of the regionals seem to be getting things right. There are fairly equal numbers of male and female reviewers, ditto for the gender of authors reviewed.

The nationals – the Australian, the Financial Review and the Monthly – all have significantly higher numbers of male reviewers, and significantly higher numbers of male authors reviewed.

AND there’s a bias towards men reviewing men and women reviewing women across the board, with men showing this preference more strongly.

So, what to do? Well, on a personal level, if you tend to reach for books by men, maybe it’s time to try something by a woman. We at Wakefield Press have suggestions (of course!).

<em>Hunger Town<em> by Wendy Scarfe

1. Hunger Town by Wendy Scarfe

Shortlisted for one of Australia’s premier writing prizes, lauded by reviewer after reviewer (of all genders), this ripping tale of a political cartoonist caught between idealism and reality is a great read.

<em>Nature's Line<em> by Janis Sheldrick

2. Nature’s Line by Janis Sheldrick

This is the definitive biography of George Goyder, whose understanding of rainfall and arability was miles ahead of many in his time. Sheldrick’s biography is meticulously researched and well written, making it a real pleasure to read.

<em>Silver Lies, Golden Truths<em> by Christine Ellis

3. Silver Lies, Golden Truths by Christine Ellis

The tale of an illegal German immigrant caught between two world wars and part of the only enemy attack to take place on Australian soil in World War I – at Broken Hill.

<em>Sweet Boy Dear Wife<em> by Heather Rossiter

4. Sweet Boy Dear Wife by Heather Rossiter

Hot off the press! A fascinating story about Jane Dieulafoy, an archaeologist who worked on sites throughout the Middle East in the nineteenth century, often dressing as a boy to work unhindered. Rossiter makes Jane’s world come alive.

<em>Fables Queer and Familiar<em> by Margaret Merrilees

5. Fables Queer and Familiar by Margaret Merrilees

Yes, it’s about lesbian grandmas, no, that doesn’t mean you have to be a lesbian grandma to enjoy it. In fact, every single person I’ve met who’s picked up this book has loved it. Hilarious, is the word that comes up over and over again.

 

Stephen Orr on Transitions

Hello all!

Hope you’re keeping warm. We have a lot going on over here at Wakefield Press, not least of all the release of Stephen Orr’s latest book, The Hands, later this month.

To keep you going until then, we’ve got Stephen’s wonderful keynote speech on transitions for the Gawler Festival of Words, reprinted with permission here:

 

So let’s look at some famous transitions. Australian culture. In the 1950s, absent, or derivative, aping American and British models? Transitioning to…hold on? Television: dumb, filled with ads, populated by lightweight personalities….wait a minute? Newspapers: once, full of analysis, facts, observation, with all editorial comment clearly defined. Now, an attempt to tell people what to think, how angry they should be, what to take offence at. Noam Chomsky explained this in his book Hopes and Prospects. He outlined how we, the Consumer, with a capital C, can be convinced to buy anything from dog food to presidents and prime ministers. ‘The Obama campaign greatly impressed the public relations industry, which named Obama “Advertising Age’s marketer of the year for 2008”, easily beating out Apple computers. A good predictor for the elections a few weeks later. The industry’s regular task is to create uninformed consumers who will make irrational choices…’

We used to have Ben Chifley, John Curtin, Christ, I’d even be happy with Hawkey, but now, as I’ll explain later, we have more propaganda.

What about music? We used to have Cold Chisel, now we have, well, I’m not sure, because they only last six months after X Factor. We used to have decent neighbourhoods. Ah, for the days of swapping fruit over the back fence. Now, we mind our own business. We used to give way, now we pull out. We used to trust our teachers, now we assume (because we’ve been told to by Today Tonight) they’re all idiots. We used to like each other, now we just like each other. We used to talk to each other. Now we just laugh out loud. The late American writer Neil Postman said we were becoming ‘the giggling society’, where, to quote, ‘Most of our daily news is inert, consisting of information that gives us something to talk about but cannot mean to any meaningful action.’
So, have I got you worried? Are you sitting there thinking, My, he’s very angry, isn’t he? Well, don’t worry, I’ll lighten up. But my point being. What is a transition? From ignorance to enlightenment? From being less to more happy? The majority being less well-off to more well-off? This is the worry. Is it that civics, manners, decency and consideration are no longer guiding change? That, now, it’s okay to ‘trust’ the government with all those boats full of refugees.
So what’s happening?

I grow up in a fibro house. The woman next door has six hundred cats. The guy next to her spends his days at the pub. Trevor, across the road, is always fiddling with his Monaro’s engine, constantly revving it. Across the road, Rod (not his real name) operates a car-seat business from home, so we have people parking in our driveway. We have a nude sun-bathing neighbour, so it’s not all bad. We’re behind the Ford workshop on North East Road, so there are always clanging spanners and really loud talkback radio. And that’s my childhood. Fantastic.
Cut to last week. I drive down my old street. Nearly all the fibros are gone, replaced by two-to-a-block townhouses with high walls so no one has to bother talking to anyone else. Say what you want about Lanark Avenue, but everyone talked to everyone. All the time. At your front door, in your front door, in your room, like we were some sort of Korean cult. What else did I see? Gardens, everyone had gotten rid of them. That’d mean you’d have to go out and risk talking to someone.

Mrs Smith’s (not her real name) orange trees? Gone. That’s the stuff you buy in bottles, made from imported Brazilian concentrate, the big supermarkets doing a deal to make sure there’s no transitioning going on in the Riverland (except to welfare).

Instead of citrus we have (ironically) little yard sculptures saying things like ‘G’day, mate’. So we can at least remember what it was like to have a friendly neighbour. But anyway, the old street had new paving, and fancier signs, and everything looked nicer. But it just got me slightly depressed. That, on the surface, we, as a community, have transitioned. But, in so doing, have lost sight of the things that matter.

Oranges, swapped. Mrs Floyd (not her real name) standing on her porch with a Winnie Blue, checking out the goings on, filing them in her gossip memory bank, before going in to iron another hundred handkerchiefs.
So, why do I reminisce? Well, there’s one house. The original inhabitant still lives there. He’s let the place go; it looks like something from ten minutes after the Hiroshima bomb. But, he’s obviously decided not to transition. Not sell the house to two-for-one developers. Not to paint it, fix the gutters, mow the lawn, water the garden. Not. He’s given the world the victory sign. And I ask myself why? Is it that he doesn’t think much about the way the world’s gone? That he doesn’t want to join our current dollar-fest? That, in short, he thinks the world stinks?

Transition. A warm day. 1985. The author (here) steps from a red hen, considers Gawler Railway Station and wonders what he’s got himself into. If anyone’s seen Wake in Fright …

Anyway, there is a bus to the college, and me and a few other gawky, suburban teenagers climb aboard. Torn leather. The side-burned driver crunching gears. And off we go. My first transition, from childhood to tertiary student; son of the suburbs to semi-rural student of natural resource management; half-interested Matriculant, to marginally-interested undergraduate; living at home to living in the halls of residence; a quiet life, to a wild life, watching semi-naked ag students saunter from the horse tarts’ bedrooms. Shock! Although there was more to come.
We arrive, settle in, make our way to the dining room for the first of a rotation of seven meals repeated, ad infinitum. Lecture, study, eat, sleep, go to the tavern for a few beers. But within months it’s sleep-in, skip lectures, spend a lot more time in the tavern, cram for exams, miraculously pass.
Thirty years ago. I remember my time at Roseworthy as a free and easy semi love-in, the smell of sheep shit and rotting grapes, Friday night movies and the inevitable aggie versus nat rat conflicts. Slightly pathetic, in retrospect, but the farmers couldn’t understand what all the fuss was about. And since then, more university study, wife, children, jobs, mortgages, books written, rejected, published, remaindered, forgotten. A whole life, full of transitions. But this arrival in Gawler was the first turning point. And it’s strange how we remember turning points, key moments, life’s biggest mistakes and strokes of good fortune. We, as self-interested individuals. But the world has also transitioned. Back then, no mobile phones. A HP computer with floppy, perhaps, but it couldn’t do much more than find a mean statistical value. People still bought Australian cars, went to pubs to see Australian bands, purchased Adelaide houses with median values of $72,200 (although Sydney’s was $88,000, which shows how much things have changed in a generation) – all this paid for by an average wage of $250 per week.

And, may I suggest, we’ve transitioned. From a much more easy-going people, happy to laugh at Strop, get about in Target shorts and thongs, to live in our fibro (before a home became an investment, not a place to live). To serious, worried people, concerned that our neighbours might be earning more, going on better holidays, sending his or her kids to better private schools.

Perhaps the degree of transitioning, coinciding with the deregulation of financial markets in the nineties, has been too much, too soon, and we are left wondering, where did our lives go? The things we value? Your home is your greatest investment and Warren and Sons are the professional house painter Brisbane you will ever need for your home or business. When did people stop indicating, letting others merge? When did we all decide it was important to have an opinion on everything and everyone, and share it, all day and every day, on social media? When did we all become offence takers? You know, the sort who won’t join a conversation, but if (God help you) you say something they’re not happy about …

So what I want to suggest today is that change needs to be considered, and generally isn’t. Driven, as it is, by corporations, pushing governments to put computers into every student’s hands, despite a lack of data suggesting this might help them. Governments telling us that suburban sprawl should stop at Munno Para, while palms are greased with the endless release of former farming land, destined to be new themed suburbs. All so we can keep the dream of suburbia. But Gawler was never suburbia and, I suspect, many don’t want it to be. But what I’ve seen since I first arrived in this town a generation ago suggests you’re gonna get it anyway. Which is a pity. Best of town and country. Perhaps, but it was always more than that. Gawler, to me, was always a sun-baked town, full of cockies in utes parked out front of the bank, going in to have it out with the manager. Gawler was the place I bought my first Crowded House record, went shopping every week with my housemates when I entered third year, and a share house. Gawler was (less so now) the country, deciding it didn’t want to get any closer to the city. And there was always that gap – those few paddocks as you drove north. But it’s closing. The shops coming. The fast food joints. And Gawler is left asking, What do we want to be? But in a way, succumbing. To the $7.95 burger and chips meal. The hydro shop, adult magazine shop – all of the joys of city living.
Anyway, back to Roseworthy. Fist drunken encounters, bit of a spew in the communal bathrooms. Speaking of which – this was scary for a shy 17 year old who’d never seen another adult body. The farmers came into the shower block, whipped it off, soaped it up, had a yarn, as I stood shaking in my tinea-proof thongs (although they weren’t). How the hell are yer?
Point being. It wasn’t an easy transition. It never is, really. I caught a rash from that bathroom, and had to go to the doctor for the first time as a semi-adult, show him what I’d contracted in the Roseworthy showers, as he twirled his mo and said, Bad show, old chap, we better get something onto that!
And the meals. Basic. Chops, and mash, and three veg from a can. Suet pudding, although we came to believe it was something left over from the artificial insemination workshops.
Transition. Out of my comfort zone. Which is what we all need, I guess.

And if you’d asked me at the time if I wanted to stay, I’d have said no, but now, looking back, I remember it as an ongoing fun-fest, drinking nights around a camp fire at the old dump, trips to Broken Hill to study arid zone land management, but even that had more to do with the calibre of NSW public houses.

And so, armed with my degree, and a diploma in education, I applied for a teaching job. Nothing, of course, in SA, so I accepted a position at Hervey Bay in Queensland. Arrived, on a hot and steamy February day, case in hand, at a tin-pot airport, a stray dog wandering the tarmac. No one to meet me, so I called a taxi and made my way to the Desert Palms Motor Inn. And this is where I stayed for the next two weeks, until my furniture arrived from Adelaide. The other teachers drove me around, helped me find a rental, which I eventually secured in lovely, downtown Pialba. More dogs wandering the roads, which were only half-tarred, in the middle, because the council didn’t have enough money to do them all.
Yes, another transition, from my home town, to a state where they have actual jobs. Permanent, full-time. And here’s another failed transition. South Australia. Still hobbling along with high unemployment, its young and talented still leaving for their own Hervey Bays, allowing the unchecked growth of a public service that seems to employ half the state. There are many reasons, most concerning our failure to adapt to a loss of the Playford legacy – that is, manufacturing growing out of what was previously an agricultural economy. But there was never another Playford, seeing the future, leading us towards education-based industries, advanced manufacturing, encouraging the long-term investment that other states are now beginning to profit from. And this is sad. When I returned to SA in the late 1990s there were still no jobs. And even now, with the nation’s highest unemployment, we’re faced with the reality that we didn’t transition. From the comfortable, cable-knit cosiness of our childhoods, to a vibrant, pulsating economy, the basis of jobs, wealth, and ever-increasing employment.
Anyway, back to Hervey Bay. I transitioned into a classroom on stilts, from a semi-educated dweep from Adelaide, to a semi-educated Queensland dweep. Twenty kids looking at me like, You’ve got no idea what yer doing, do yer?
As I adapted to the realities of teaching. Twenty-five pairs of eyes waiting for you to say something half-intelligent.
Well, guys, who wants to help me balance this equation?
No response.
The reactants, here, the products here…it’s easy!

Until the second or third Saturday morning, down at the local Target, where one of my less-inclined students called out across a busy mall: Hey, Mr Orr, you f*** c***.

I stopped to think a moment. Perhaps I’d misheard. But come Monday morning, all was denied. I was left wondering what I’d done. A new career. New town. New life, with a child on the way.

A funny transition. From a comfortable to a challenging life. But this, I guess, is the only way humans can grow. We soon moved from Hervey Bay to Maryborough, made some of the closest friends we’ve ever had, learned to love the sleepy old town. And now, in retrospect, it seems that nothing can really be achieved in life without moving from your comfort zone.
And is this, I wonder, what we have failed to do as a state? Imagine our own futures? Act. Take risks. But there’s no rush, apparently. There’ll always be the footy, and the netball, like a long Saturday afternoon in Kadina (another one of my teaching transitions). As we ask, wherever we are, if we’ve gone stale? Here in Gawler, perhaps? Is staying the same really an option? Railing against shopping centres, housing developments. Is it that those of us who like it as it is, or was, have no real vision of a future Gawler, or Adelaide?

As a writer this worries me. South Australians like their culture in measured doses. A festival here and there – but nothing too taxing. And books. How many Croweaters could name more than two or three South Australian writers working today?

Or poets, who always seem to get a raw deal. Maybe this is because so many of our creative people head interstate. I know many. But why? All of the great American writers were regional (Faulkner, Thomas Woolfe, Flannery O’Connor, John Steinbeck – the list goes on). Maybe size doesn’t matter. Maybe creative people like to feel at least a bit valued. Maybe, despite what many say, they can’t work in a vacuum, mostly ignored. People like Barbara Hanrahan and Colin Thiele did relatively well, but try finding any of their books in your local bookshop. And what about poor old Caroline Carleton? Heard of her? She moved to Australia with her trainee doctor husband in 1839, wading ashore at Glenelg. She was tough. Both of her children had died en route. Her husband’s medical career fizzled and he ended up working as the superintendent of West Terrace Cemetery. While living on site (it had its own crematorium in those days), Caroline wrote a poem called Song of Australia which won the Gawler Institute’s competition for a patriotic poem. You all know the story of failed German potato farmer Carl Linger, who set this tune to music, but it was Caroline who started it all. This song would be sung the nation over, in classrooms, and in March 1936, for SA’s centenary, 3000 adults and 800 children filed past Caroline’s grave at Moonta Cemetery in recognition of a great South Australian.
We shouldn’t smile. Chances are, this is what fate has in store for most of us. But, it seems to me, perhaps we haven’t progressed a lot, culturally, from the days when artists were only ever slightly glorified amateurs. Poetry, for instance. Yes, we honour a few, like Les Murray and the late Judith Wright, but most poets scribble at night, teach, rack their brains to think of a way to get their work out to a wider audience. Maybe this is the true value of new festivals like the one we launch today. Not so long ago the Salisbury Writers Festival was small beans, but this year they feature Julia Gillard and William McInnes.

Which leads me to you, the readers and writers – the whole point of Gawler’s latest transition into cultural cosiness. And the bond shared between the maker and consumers of stories. The plot, the characters, the themes, the very human concerns. SA has many writing groups, from Friendly Street to Mutant Stepchildren, from the SARA (romance authors) to Starship Mawson. SA is a place where anyone can try their hand at anything. I’ve always wanted to crack the Mills and Boon market. I’ve practised, written a few experimental pages, but each time the characters have descended into existential darkness.
This all started when I was a kid. It wasn’t a very booky household, but I noticed, watching the better episodes of MASH, that there was some sort of truth in a story, as long as it was well told. I believed Hawkeye’s relationship with his father was special. Which was strange, because everything else on television at the time was complete crap: The Six Million Dollar Man, Wonder Woman, Arcade, Prisoner.
This led to me sniffing out books at my primary school library. Easy stuff at first, Asterix, Tin-Tin, but by the time I was in Year 11 an outstanding English teacher had put Great Expectations and Crime and Punishment in my hands, and it all started to click. The transition to writer had begun.

Year 12 was spent writing my first novel, A Drop in the Ocean, a Dickensian story about the troubled relationship between a child and his Catholic priest father. Okay, I hadn’t done my research, but I wanted to write.

This was Walt Whitman’s procreant urge – to make, forge new worlds out of words. By the way, this manuscript was burnt on a pyre of childhood disasters some years later.
Transition. As a teacher, I assume there’s at least one potential writer in every class I teach, and it’s my job to do for him or her what my Year 11 teacher did for me. Offer encouragement. As the writers among you know, we can prosper on very short rations. When I see a kid reading a book at lunch, I always ask what it is, and start the conversation. The conversation – that makes writers. The transition, from one who reads to one who writes. It’s not that great a leap. Like a musical improviser deciding to write down what he’s playing. The transition. And writing sometimes seems so marginal, so it’s hugely important to encourage our young writers. They’ll have to tackle a society that would rather see them spend their Saturdays shooting goals.
Anyway, my great novel was finished, wrapped in brown paper and sent off to Penguin. Scene: editorial room at Penguin publishers, sometime in the mid-80s.
Hey, Gazz, you seen this one – A Drop in the Ocean?
Yeah, mate. Laughed for hours.
What, a comedy, was it?
No – but that’s the funny thing.
Not to be deterred by the rejection letter (in the days they still sent them – now they don’t bother responding at all) I gave up on literature.
But, of course, you can’t.

And this is another thing I tell kids. Writing is like tuberculosis. Once you’ve got it … you can fight it, ignore it, medicate it, or try and reason with it, but it will win. In a year, two, ten, fifty. Like a visit to KFC. Each time you say, I’ll never eat that crap again, but you do, don’t you?

And so, there I was, in my mid-20s, teaching in Hervey Bay, starting to scribble again. The thing being, once you’ve transitioned to creativity, you can’t go back to your old life (as Thomas Woolfe said, You Can’t Go Home Again). I finished a book based on the disappearance of two jackaroos in the desert in 1987, sent it off to more publishers, had it rejected by all of them and decided, perhaps, I wasn’t so good at this after all.
Back in the drawer, and back to the classroom, chairs flying all around me as I remembered how I’d felt, as a kid, watching Alan Alda talk about the important things. How I’d thought, Surely there can’t be anything more important than this?
As I waited another few years, kept scribbling, then entered my jackaroo story in the Australian/Vogel award for young novelists. Runner-up. Which was enough to bring me to the attention of Allen and Unwin, the same company that had rejected the same manuscript a few years before. This time they offered to publish it, and the promises of Hawkeye, and Klinger, were realised, sort of.
And the lesson here. Writing’s a nasty business. One part (the publishers and market place) are at odds with the other part (the slightly shy, mal-adjusted person scribbling in his or her bedroom). All writers suspect they might have something worthwhile to say, and they look for other’s approval, and often, don’t receive it. Which leads me to today, and the importance of writing groups, festivals, even a casual remark, something said as we read our kid’s homework.

So what the hell have I been rabbiting on about? Well, the idea, when I started, was that we all grow, develop, change, and what we want from life changes. Perhaps this is the process of working out what we think to be really important. Yes, kids have to be fed, mortgages paid, lawns mowed, but also, societies have to focus on what humans need. Not just more shopping centres, but also, bookshops, cafes, theatres. Not just more footy fields, or freshly surfaced netball courts, but places for quiet reflection. Libraries, for instance.

A 2013 report in The Guardian UK showed that the number of people visiting a library at least once a year in the UK had dropped by 25% since records had begun in 2005. This, the authors suggested, was at least partly caused by the closure of hundreds of libraries (9% over the same period) by cash-strapped local councils.

This seems like a bad transition. Some would argue it’s caused by the availability of e-books, online libraries and the like, but this has never really been quantified, and it may be, as I suspect, that our kids aren’t reading Little Women on their iPads as much as … well, you know, women, generally.

I’ll leave the last words to my favourite author, Patrick White. He believed we were an easily distracted people. He suggested that a lot of us were really kidults, unwilling or unable to cope with the complexities of the world. He suggested this was leading us down a raspberry-flavoured path or silliness and trivia. He wondered whether every transition was a good one. As an example, he told the story of Prime Minister Ben Chifley. How, after a goodwill visit to Longreach in 1947, he strolled back to his hotel with a local journalist. How he stopped to talk to a local drunk, wish him well, before heading up to his room. White described Curtin as a ‘calm, self-contained, solitary figure.’ He said, ‘One wonders, do today’s private jets and army of minders make for better government? How, in the space of forty years, did it all get so much out of control?’
A question we’re all left wondering. When our present world fails to live up to the promises of our early visions. As we’re forced to ask ourselves, again, What should today, what will tomorrow look like? And will I like it?

We heart Radio Adelaide

Just a reminder (on this lovely, not-too-hot Monday) of how great Radio Adelaide is.

Diana Chessell, author of Adelaide’s Dissenting Headmaster, was interviewed by the very well-spoken and engaging Ewart Shaw on Sunday. Listen to their fascinating conversation on John Lorenzo Young here.

<em>Adelaide's Dissenting Headmaster<em> launch

Meanwhile, Mag Merrilees continues her instalments of Fables Queer and Familiar at Radio Adelaide, all of which are available here.

And then there have been interviews with Kate Strohm, Dino Hodge, Janis Sheldrick and Phil Butterss – just in the last year!

Radio Adelaide was Australia’s first ever community radio station, founded by the University of Adelaide in 1972. With over 400 volunteers helping them run the show, they have numerous awards to their name and keep the conversation about art, politics and current events going with some damn fine music in between.

Keep up the good work, guys. It’s very much appreciated. Read more about Radio Adelaide here, and have a browse through their podcasts here.

Wednesday links

The Wednesday links are in, kids!

Have you checked the news today? Because we’re getting excited about all of this Harper Lee business. Time to rewatch Gregory Peck in the movie version <swoon!>.

Also, ever wondered what kind of feedback James Joyce would have got from his creative writing class on his Ulysses?
McSweeney’s have too!

Balked a bit at some of Molly’s “sexier” thoughts, which read like male fantasy. You can do better than this, Jim.

Ah, glory.

 

And, last but not least, we have not one or two but SEVEN launches coming up in March. Yes, we’re exhausted already. Yes, we’ll be sending you those details soon. In the meanwhile, y’all better come to our Geoff Goodfellow event next Saturday!

 

With kisses from WP HQ